![]() |
Image Attribution: www.newyorker.com |
Today,
I will take a deeper dive - anecdotally - into where commercial real estate
values may be headed. Spoiler alert. In this columnist’s opinion - don’t look
up.
Investors - capitalized net income. Those whom
rely upon rents generated from commercial real estate approach value
differently than residents of their business locations.
Let’s
use this simple example. If annual net rents are $12.00 and the market return
for this income is 5% - the resulting price per square foot is $240 - $12.00
divided by .05. As you can gather - a change in rents can skew the net income.
If returns are no longer 5% but hop to 6.5% - a decline in worth results. Again
- annual net rents dropping to $10.00 with a 6.5% return yields a capitalized
value of $153 per square foot. Wow! That is a precipitous fall. In reality -
the analysis is a bit more complex as things such as length of the lease,
credit of the tenant, and sustainability of the income are considered.
But, simply - a decline in rent or an increase in the market
return spells doom for the worth of commercial real estate.
A
couple of weeks ago, an investor friend of mine shared with me a conversation
he had with a tenant. Approaching a lease renewal pre-virus - he and his
occupant were discussing a rate of $1.10 per square foot or $13.20 per year.
Unable to reach agreement - they hit pause as the virus overtook our society.
Settled at $.90 were their negotiations. Simply waiting 45 days saved the
tenant $.20 per square foot. As the investor will not be selling - thus the
decline in value will not be realized - he will nonetheless receive
significantly less income. This illustrates how rents may adjust in the weeks
ahead. Additionally, if a vacancy is marketed and takers are few - an owner
might sharpen his pencil to lease the space. Yep! Another data point for rent
reduction. As these new COMPS filter through our industry - rates are reset.
Owner occupants - utility. Most who own
and occupy commercial real estate with their business don’t speak the foreign
language of capitalized net income. You see, the value they place upon
commercial real estate relies more on their use of the location and the
corresponding payment for that utility. Consequently, if a cheap beater of a
building has crappy loading, insufficient power, or is miles from the freeway -
very few suitors will surface - making it worthless to most occupants. Making,
shipping, or servicing goods carries a profit structure independent of the
worth of the operation’s home. Sure. Real estate has its place in the cost
structure of said products - but ultimately whether that expense is a rent
check to a landlord or debt service to a lender is immaterial. The ordinary
business expense is the same. I know, I know - there are infinite tax benefits
to paying yourself rent vs a landlord but that’s a conversation for another
column. Typically, if space is needed, the local inventory of available
buildings will be scanned, toured, and analyzed. Culled will be those not
fitting the amenity requirements. Considered? What rent will be paid if leased
vs what will a mortgage payment harbor. Simply, value for an occupant is
largely determined by the number of avails that correspond with the needs. More
- fewer takers - cheaper. Fewer - more competition and presumably more
expensive. Corresponding interest rates from which a location may be finance?
Sure! Low rates can bridge the divide between the price to rent vs own. But,
ultimately - the location MUST have the goodies.
Allen C. Buchanan, SIOR, is a principal with Lee &
Associates Commercial Real Estate Services in Orange. He can be reached
at abuchanan@lee-associates.com or 714.564.7104. His
website is allencbuchanan.blogspot.com.
No comments :
Post a Comment