Friday, March 29, 2019

Is Your Building Ownership a Mirror Image?

Commercial real estate ownership is a beautiful thing! What other investment can you own and experience the tax advantages of depreciation, passive income treatment, and capital gains - all while the asset is appreciating.

If you own a business that occupies your commercial real estate - even better! Now, you have the occupant (tenant) paying you (landlord) rent. I’ve witnessed this structure numerous times over the years - and it works the majority of the time.

Today’s column is centered around those few occasions when the structure hits a snag.

First a bit of background:

Common among commercial real estate ownership is an entity known as an LLC - Limited Liability Company. An LLC may have one or a number of “members” each with a percentage of the stake. The LLC owns and operates the real estate - collects rent, pays the bills, is registered with the state, and files a tax return. Generally the taxes owed are passed down to the members via a K-1. Great!

Common among operating business ownership is the corporation - generally a C or S Corp. Each have different rules of taxation - which is a topic for another day. Suffice to say this entity pays rent to the building ownership - LLC. Cool!

Here’s where things can get dicey.

The LLC and Corporation have different owners. More than once recently we’ve seen this. What starts as an LLC with members whose ownership percentages mirror the shares of the business corporation can morph over time. In one extreme example - we had a building ownership comprised of a church, an ex-wife, two of the original owner’s children, a non-profit, and a former health care taker. By the way - initially the LLC had one member - the proprietor of the company! Death of the original owner caused all manner of chaos - as you can imagine. The result? An eviction of the business and a forced sale of the real estate. Ugly!

The operating business changes hands. With the spate of merger and acquisition activity these days - this is quite common. Typically, the company is acquired, a lease is struck with the LLC and things proceed. Over time however, a disconnect can occur - a smaller footprint is needed, sales decline, expensive improvements are required, the business goes bust. All easy when the building and business are identical twins. Not so easy when the twins are fraternal.

The commercial real estate is sold. No problem if you’re happy to fork over close to half the gain the commercial real estate has enjoyed. Sell it and pay Uncle Sam and Cousin Gavin. Done! If, however, the LLC chooses to defer the gain through the use of a 1031 tax deferred exchange - the LLC - all of the members - must be in lock step. What if an LLC member wants to take his cash and move to Cabo? A complicated buyout must follow. We’ve witnessed what’s called a “swap and drop” in these instances. Simply, the LLC is disbanded and replaced with a Tenants in Common vesting. Now the “tenants” - upon the sale - can self direct their percentage of the sale proceeds. In practice, this is much more complex. Please seek tax and legal counsel before employing this strategy!

Allen C. Buchanan, SIOR, is a principal with Lee & Associates Commercial Real Estate Services in Orange. He can be reached at abuchanan@lee-associates.com or 714.564.7104. His website is allencbuchanan.com.

Friday, March 15, 2019

What Can Make a Sublease Unmarketable - 5 Situations

I recently wrote about the Yin and Yang of subleases wherein I discussed the elements which make a sublease risky and non-beneficial to the owner and occupant of a building - “because subleases are generally unfavorable to the original occupant (sub-landlord) and owner (master landlord), risky, and complicated.” Also discussed was a definition of a sublease - “What is a Sublease? When a tenant must relieve himself of a lease obligation prior to the expiration of the lease, the need to sublease occurs.

Today, I embark on an explanation of the five situations which can cause a sublease to be unmarketable.

The term of lease. We toured a space yesterday being marketed for sublease. A decision to vacate prior to the expiration of the lease was made by an occupant whose corporate headquarters are out-of-state. Now fifteen months remain on the lease obligation. Akin to a well shopped clearance rack at Nordstrom - the short term will appeal to very few occupants. You see - generally - a three to seven year term is sought by prospective tenants. A move is expensive, disruptive, and quite inefficient. Most are unwilling to move only to do so again a year later - if extension terms can’t be reached with the owner of the building.

Uncooperative owner. Owners ride the length of their leases through market swings. In the example above - additional years could be tacked onto the fifteen months - if - the owner will play ball. Where we are in a market cycle - up or down trending - can predict how a landlord will react to a request for a longer lease. If our market is improving - he has no incentive to strike today. Storm clouds on the horizon? Yes! Let’s deal.

No concessions. A tenant with remaining years on their lease wants out - as quickly and cheaply as possible. Consequently - requests for changes to the space - at the tenant’s expense - are not typically on the table. Furthermore - most occupants - who have vacated - are not interested in investing to re-furbish the interior. Therefore - a sad, worn out building greets prospective occupants. Not terribly inviting.
Credit of the occupant. An owner with an Amazon lease will not be terribly interested in accepting anything less. Why should he? He has Amazon on the hook. If Amazon has decided the unit no longer meets their needs and vacates - the owner can be quite selective in backfilling.

An above market rent. Any lease in SoCal originated after 2015 will most likely be above the going rate today. So grouped with your amazing credit, a short term lease, an uncooperative owner, and an unwillingness on your part to paint and carpet - you could be stuck. So what’s the answer? Conduct a fire sale of sorts. Take a look at what you owe and figure 75% of that amount. Now market your sublease at that reduced rate. You might just find that unicorn willing to transact.

Allen C. Buchanan, SIOR, is a principal with Lee & Associates Commercial Real Estate Services in Orange. He can be reached at abuchanan@lee-associates.com or 714.564.7104. His website is allencbuchanan.com.

Friday, March 1, 2019

Six Tough Commercial Real Estate Conversations - Cooperation Can Help!

Cooperation is a reality in commercial real estate deals. Meaning - a buyer and seller or landlord and tenant - must reach an agreement. Simple. But there are other layers of cooperation which factor in - the professionals representing each side - brokers, lawyers, lenders, CPAs, and the like. All must genuflect at the alter of a deal for it to close. Generally, the level of cooperation is enhanced when the advisors do their jobs. That is - conduct the tough conversations which should precede any transaction. Indulge me while I describe a few of my favorites.

The disruption of a move. Sure. Moving to save a few dollars may seem like a good idea. But, a move is expensive! Once physical moving expenses, the potential loss of key employees, downtime, fixturization of the new facility, and customer confusion are weighed - are you really saving? Have you considered things such as internet speed, a new phone number, website changes to reflect the new address, revised marketing collateral? Add any sort of complexity to the use with which you utilize the building and a costly use permit may be needed. Someone must consider the true cost of a move before you wander into the market.

Taxes, taxes, taxes. Uncle Sam, the state of California, and the Affordable Care Act will all want a major taste of your sale proceeds. The time to understand the impact is before you plant that “for sale” sign. Easy math. You can plan on approximately 40% of your gain to be consumed by taxes. Whaaaat? That’s correct. A tax professional can run the numbers for your specific situation. Sure. You can employ certain tax deferral strategies - a 1031 tax deferred exchange, a charitable remainder trust, or an installment sale - but all come with complexities which should be fully vetted.

Market realities. Small business owners that buy or lease commercial real estate are smart. They read. They listen to their customers. They’re informed. In today’s market - unrealistic owners get crushed. The halcyon days of crazy asking prices, waves of buyer interest, and feeding frenzies have vanished like La NiƱa. Sure. Deals are transacting - but, at a more normal pace.

Condition of the building. During the go-go days of 2016 and 2017 - a buyer would overlook repair necessities such as the roof, air conditioning, paving or exterior condition. Not anymore. We recommend a pre-sale inspection to identity any issues and an assigning a cost estimate. Even if you opt to wait on the fixes - you know what they will run.

Limited availabilities. The weird thing is demand still exceeds supply - there are fewer buildings on the market than buyers. What’s changed since last year? Buyers are proceeding more cautiously, offers well below asking prices are the norm, and market times have increased.

Complete information. Access to scaled drawings, an office layout, a building inspection highlighting the condition and needed repairs, a current title report, copies of leases, expenses, maintenance contracts, and utility bills - all can hasten the timing of a transaction. Buyers will ask. Have them ready.

Allen C. Buchanan, SIOR, is a principal with Lee & Associates Commercial Real Estate Services in Orange. He can be reached at abuchanan@lee-associates.com or 714.564.7104. His website is allencbuchanan.com.