What’s Really Holding Back Manufacturing in California? My Readers Had Thoughts.
When I asked whether
manufacturing could make a comeback in California, I expected opinions. What I
didn’t expect was how many of you would write back—with passion, perspective,
and firsthand experience.
Several longtime brokers,
business owners, and property operators reached out with stories spanning
decades—many with a shared theme: California doesn’t make it easy to build or
keep things here.
One former industrial broker
recalled relocating factories throughout downtown Los Angeles in the 1980s.
Then came the state’s cap-and-trade policy. Practically overnight, his
relocation business dried up. Later, when he purchased a company that tested gas
meters for regulatory compliance, he experienced the same policy from the other
side—as a required vendor. “I saw the devastation of that rule from both
careers,” he said.
Another reader, an industrial
property owner and operator, offered this blunt assessment: “If I were younger,
California wouldn’t be high on my list to start a manufacturing plant.” He lost
his first building to a Caltrans eminent domain action, spending five years in
court to get fair value. After relocating, his new site was downzoned for
residential use, leaving him with a conditional use permit and uncertain
future.
And then there were the comments
about outsourcing—not just of jobs, but of environmental impact. One reader
pointed out that many of the regulations we impose on manufacturers in
California are simply sidestepped when products are made overseas. Industries
like plating, painting, and circuit board production face strict scrutiny
here—but far less abroad. “We all buy the China goods,” he said, “but we should
at least admit we’re contributing to global environmental problems.”
It’s not all frustration, though.
What stood out to me wasn’t just what these readers had endured—but how much
they still cared. They aren’t bitter. They’re tired. Tired of unpredictable
zoning, endless permitting delays, and policies that seem to penalize job
creators.
In my previous column, I outlined
five priorities for reviving manufacturing in California: regulatory reform,
land use stability, energy reliability, workforce development, and targeted
incentives. Based on your feedback, I’d add one more: listen
to the people on the ground.
The decisions we make in city
halls and state agencies ripple outward—sometimes for decades. Want to grow
clean tech? Preserve industrial zoning. Want local jobs? Support the employers
who are already here. Want sustainable supply chains? Don’t offshore our
pollution.
California doesn’t need to be the
cheapest place to manufacture. But it does need to be competitive, reliable, and forward-looking.
Manufacturing won’t return on
sentiment alone. It requires trust, coordination, and smart policy. We still
have the talent, the infrastructure, and the entrepreneurial spirit. What we
need now is the will.
Let’s not lose the manufacturers
we still have while we wait for the next reshoring trend to arrive. Let’s make
California a place where building things is still possible—and worth it.
No comments :
Post a Comment