![]() |
Image Attribution:www.therealdeal.com |
Termination clauses. Occasionally
in a lease arrangement - especially with major corporations - an “opt-out”
provision is requested. Simply, these give a tenant the right to terminate
their lease prior to the expiration. Flexibility - in case the space is
outgrown or exceeds capacity - generally is the reason. But these wreak havoc
on the back and forth. You see, an owner expects a flow of income for several
years. Rate, concessions, and motivation are reflected. If this stream can be
interrupted - landlords view the worst case and react accordingly. A five year
lease with a termination after three really is a three year commitment.
Options to buy. Options
benefit the occupant. Period. Terribly one sided and limiting - many owners
simply refuse to consider them. You see, if the title holder grants an option
to buy, he’s locked in. Sure. He can sell to someone else, but the new buyer
must honor the option. It’s murky. Softer solutions exist. Rights of First
Refusal or Rights of First Offer are examples.
Special purpose tenant improvements. If you’re looking to a landlord to fund your freezer cooler space,
add a clean room, or double the amount of private offices - expect some reluctance.
Typically, dollars invested to modify a building are viewed for their reuse. An
owner considers how valuable the adds will be to future residents and responds
accordingly.
No financing contingency. We
sold a property earlier this year for the income it produced. Our buyer was a
well-heeled investor with ready cash to deploy. He will not occupy the building
but will own it and reap the returns. His offer did not require a loan -
therefore his performance was not conditioned on a lender nod. However, most
buyers who plan to house their business within the premises need some time to
get funding. A seller unwilling to allow this contingency may force a buyer to
look elsewhere.
Closing extensions. A
seller planning to re-invest the proceeds through a tax deferred exchange has
strict timeframes to follow once the sale consummates - 45 days to identify
within a 180 day completion. Therefore, we occasionally see extension requests.
If closing is delayed, the clock remains at zero until the deal is done - thus
giving the seller “free time” to find a replacement property. Buyers are in
peril, however, as loan commitments or operational needs dictate their
timing.
Lengthy contingency periods.
Sellers seek certainty of close. Extended uncertainty will kill most
transactions. A great example occurs when a buyer contemplates a use change -
like converting industrial to residential. Municipalities have something to say
and they say things quite deliberately. It’s not uncommon for the rezoning - if
needed - to eclipse 18 months. An awful lot can change in that period.
Consequently, few sellers are willing to “tie up” their property on a
maybe.
Allen C. Buchanan,
SIOR, is a principal with Lee
& Associates Commercial Real Estate Services in Orange. He can be reached
at abuchanan@lee-associates.com or 714.564.7104. His website is allencbuchanan.blogspot.com.
No comments :
Post a Comment