Random Commercial Real Estate Thoughts

Currently, my inbox is cluttered. Seeking catharsis - this column will cause a clearing - which creates calm. Only one week left in the third quarter of 2022. 2023 is an Auld Lang Syne away. Blink and it’ll be here. 

Harvested from two calls today, here are a couple of situations that caused angst. 

What is a gross-up provision and why should you care? For context, this came up today in a marathon round with counsel, landlord and tenant. We are negotiating a lease with a public ally traded company and a local owner. These conversations are steeped in minutia but typically educational. According to Donald R. Oder, an attorney in San Diego, “Depending on the type of lease, the tenant may bear all or only a portion of the landlord’s expenses.  In a “triple net lease,” all of the landlord’s operating expenses are passed on to the tenant.  A lease may, however, contain an “expense stop” which establishes a point at which expenses begin to be passed on to the tenant.  In this type of lease, expenses for a “base year” are determined – the expense stop.  Thereafter, the landlord pays expenses equal to the base year and the tenant pays its pro rata share of the rest.  For example, if a lease contained an expense stop at $10,000 (“base year” expenses), and the landlord’s operating expenses were actually $11,000, the tenant would pay the $1,000 over the expense stop. It has become more common in recent years for office leases to contain what’s referred to as a “gross up” provision. Gross up provisions permit landlords to “gross-up”, or overstate, operating expenses to simulate the building being at full capacity.
 
Here’s how a gross up provision would work in the real world:

Assume the gross up provision states that common area maintenance expenses will be calculated for each tenant as if the building was fully occupied, or at 100% capacity.  Further assume the building is currently only at 50% occupancy.

Under this set of facts, a $1,000 expense to the landlord would be multiplied by a gross up factor of 2 (100% (the markup rate) / 50% (the level of occupancy)).  $1,000 x 2 = $2,000 (the grossed up operating expense).  The tenant is required to pay a pro rata share based on the percentage of space it occupies – let’s assume 20%.  In this scenario, the tenant’s total grossed up obligation would be $400.” 

Vacancy in office buildings has crept up in the past two years. In a healthy environment, the amount of dark space in a building would be a thing. But now it is. So, pay careful attention when leasing office space.

 Contingency periods. By definition, a contingency or due diligence period allows a buyer to study a purchase - upon their terms - with no obligation to complete the sale if something untoward is discovered and not remedied. Sometimes a seller passes along a vault of information which makes review and approval a snap. Other times, this becomes the buyer’s responsibility - third party reports such as environmental, building inspection, seismic, ALTA survey, zoning report, etc. must be ordered, completed, reviewed and approved. Presumably, enough time is built into the purchase agreement allowing the buyer to either approve existing reports or procure and approve. But what happens if the seller is tardy in delivering the reports to the buyer. Does the approval period automatically extend? This devil in the details caused havoc recently in a deal. We found common ground by saying the contingency period is the later of thirty days from opening of escrow or ten days from receipt of the reports. Bingo. 

Allen C. Buchanan, SIOR, is a principal with Lee & Associates Commercial Real Estate Services in Orange. He can be reached at abuchanan@lee-associates.com or 714.564.7104. His website is allencbuchanan.blogspot.com

6 Non-Starters for Commercial Real Estate Deals

Commercial real estate transactions, akin to a dance, take two to tango. In the case of a lease - opposite are the tenant and landlord sometimes called Lessee and Lessor. When a building purchase is considered, a buyer and seller square off. Customary in both is a negotiation which precedes the agreement - a lease document or purchase and sale contract. Outlined in most negotiations is a set of deal points - price, term, concessions and the like. Generally, both sides of the aisle have representation - a commercial real estate professional or a real estate attorney. Depending upon the dollar consideration, both vocations may be employed. Frequently, a general outline is submitted by brokers and agreed to to by both parties and then attorneys fine tune the language. When a deal takes flight - it’s a beautiful thing. But, there are some requests which prevent lift-off. A few of these “Houston, we have a problem” are listed below. 

Termination clauses. Occasionally in a lease arrangement - especially with major corporations - an “opt-out” provision is requested. Simply, these give a tenant the right to terminate their lease prior to the expiration. Flexibility - in case the space is outgrown or exceeds capacity - generally is the reason. But these wreak havoc on the back and forth. You see, an owner expects a flow of income for several years. Rate, concessions, and motivation are reflected. If this stream can be interrupted - landlords view the worst case and react accordingly. A five year lease with a termination after three really is a three year commitment. 

Options to buy. Options benefit the occupant. Period. Terribly one sided and limiting - many owners simply refuse to consider them. You see, if the title holder grants an option to buy, he’s locked in. Sure. He can sell to someone else, but the new buyer must honor the option. It’s murky. Softer solutions exist. Rights of First Refusal or Rights of First Offer are examples. 
 
Special purpose tenant improvements. If you’re looking to a landlord to fund your freezer cooler space, add a clean room, or double the amount of private offices - expect some reluctance. Typically, dollars invested to modify a building are viewed for their reuse. An owner considers how valuable the adds will be to future residents and responds accordingly. 

No financing contingency. We sold a property earlier this year for the income it produced. Our buyer was a well-heeled investor with ready cash to deploy. He will not occupy the building but will own it and reap the returns. His offer did not require a loan - therefore his performance was not conditioned on a lender nod. However, most buyers who plan to house their business within the premises need some time to get funding. A seller unwilling to allow this contingency may force a buyer to look elsewhere. 
 
Closing extensions. A seller planning to re-invest the proceeds through a tax deferred exchange has strict timeframes to follow once the sale consummates - 45 days to identify within a 180 day completion. Therefore, we occasionally see extension requests. If closing is delayed, the clock remains at zero until the deal is done - thus giving the seller “free time” to find a replacement property. Buyers are in peril, however, as loan commitments or operational needs dictate their timing.  

Lengthy contingency periods. Sellers seek certainty of close. Extended uncertainty will kill most transactions. A great example occurs when a buyer contemplates a use change - like converting industrial to residential. Municipalities have something to say and they say things quite deliberately. It’s not uncommon for the rezoning - if needed - to eclipse 18 months. An awful lot can change in that period. Consequently, few sellers are willing to “tie up” their property on a maybe. 
 
Allen C. Buchanan, SIOR, is a principal with Lee & Associates Commercial Real Estate Services in Orange. He can be reached at abuchanan@lee-associates.com or 714.564.7104. His website is allencbuchanan.blogspot.com.